Monday, May 3, 2010

POST #2 DRAFT (WALMART)

I believe that eliminating test for potential employees should be done to improve the work environment. For Wal-Mart because it would improve the economy and other aspects of the company also make workers and customer.

People have to make a living and should be giving equal opportunity to do so. A lot of low and middle class families have to take on two jobs to pay their bills and feed their kids. Also a lot of families have to leave their neighborhood to find a cheaper place to live. On one hand, people would feel discriminated from having the chance to work because of a test to determine the work ethic that the person would be able to provide.

I personally think is very unnecessary to have a test like best-buy or Macys have in their companies. It puts a damper on certain people that are trying to move up in the work force

Also having an alternative to provide training for different position in Wal-Mart like stock, sales rep, human services etc. Employees would be able to attend to more customers and have efficient skills to carry conservation. Open or close transaction with customers and have a great impact in their daily lives.

eliminate test employees wouldn’t be overloaded with work of two or three people. Manager and supervisors forget that people breaks and it can take a lot of energy and put stress on them and the quality of work goes down.

1 comment:

  1. A good start - think about how to add in your texts to support the ideas, and be sure the first paragraph will make sense to an outside reader.

    ReplyDelete